marx's proof regarding surplus value and profit
by Gil Skillman
12 March 2002 21:53 UTC


Charles, you write
>
>CB: Your argument for this is probably in your previous posts, but could you 
>reiterate it ?  Does it follow from something else that surplus value is a 
>necessary condition for profit ?  Marx makes surplus value part of the 
>definition of profit.
>

First things first:  where does Marx make surplus value part of his
definition of profit?

^^^^^^^

CB: Capital Vol. III


Chapter 2. The Rate of Profit
 

-clip-

The capitalist does not care whether it is considered that he advances constant 
capital to make a profit out of his variable capital, or that he advances variable 
capital to enhance the value of the constant capital; that he invests money in wages 
to raise the value of his machinery and raw materials, or that he invests money in 
machinery and raw materials to be able to exploit labour. Although it is only the 
variable portion of capital which creates surplus-value, it does so only if the other 
portions, the conditions of production, are likewise advanced. Seeing that the 
capitalist can exploit labour only by advancing constant capital and that he can turn 
his constant capital to good account only by advancing variable capital, he lumps them 
all together in his imagination, and much more so since the actual rate of his gain is 
not determined by its proportion to the variable, but to the total capital, not by the 
rate of surplus-value, but by the rate of profit. And the latter!
, as we shall see, may remain the same and yet express different rates of 
surplus-value.

The costs of the product include all the elements of its value paid by the capitalist 
or for which he has thrown an equivalent into production. These costs must be made 
good to preserve the capital or to reproduce it in its original magnitude.

The value contained in a commodity is equal to the labour-time expended in its 
production, and the sum of this labour consists of paid and unpaid portions. But for 
the capitalist the costs of the commodity consist only of that portion of the labour 
materialised in it for which he has paid. The surplus-labour contained in the 
commodity costs the capitalist nothing, although, like the paid portion, it costs the 
labourer his labour, and although it creates value and enters into the commodity as a 
value-creating element quite like paid labour. The capitalist's profit is derived from 
the fact that he has something to sell for which he has paid nothing. The 
surplus-value, or profit, consists precisely in the excess value of a commodity over 
its cost-price, i.e., the excess of the total labour embodied in the commodity over 
the paid labour embodied in it. The surplus-value, whatever its origin, is thus a 
surplus over the advanced total capital. The proportion of this surplus to the!
 total, capital is therefore expressed by the fraction s/C , in which C stands for 
total capital. We thus obtain the rate of profit s/C=s/(c+v), as distinct from the 
rate of surplus-value s/v.

The rate of surplus-value measured against the variable capital is called rate of 
surplus-value. The rate of surplus-value measured against the total capital is called 
rate of profit. These are two different measurements of the same entity, and owing to 
the difference of the two standards of measurement they express different proportions 
or relations of this entity.



Capital Vol. III

Part I. The Conversion of Surplus-Value into Profit and of the Rate of Surplus-Value 
into the Rate of Profit
Chapter 3. The Relation of the Rate of Profit to the Rate of Surplus-Value
 

Here, as at the close of the preceding chapter, and generally in this entire first 
part, we presume the amount of profit falling to a given capital to be equal to the 
total amount of surplus-value produced by means of this capital during a certain 
period of circulation. We thus leave aside for the present the fact that, on the one 
hand, this surplus-value may be broken up into various sub-forms, such as interest on 
capital, ground-rent, taxes, etc., and that, on the other, it is not, as a rule, 
identical with profit as appropriated by virtue of a general rate of profit, which 
will be discussed in the second part.

So far as the quantity of profit is assumed to be equal to that of surplus-value, its 
magnitude, and that of the rate of profit, is determined by ratios of simple figures 
given or ascertainable in every individual case. The analysis, therefore, first is 
carried on purely in the mathematical field.

We retain the designations used in Books I and II. Total capital C consists of 
constant capital c and variable capital v, and produces a surplus-value s. The ratio 
of this surplus-value to the advanced variable capital, or s/v, is called the rate of 
surplus-value and designated s'. Therefore s/v=s', and consequently s=s'v. If this 
surplus-value is related to the total capital instead of the variable capital, it is 
called profit, p, and the ratio of the surplus-value s to the total capital C, or s/C, 
is called the rate of profit, p'. Accordingly,

p'= s
---
C = s
---
c+v 

Now, substituting for s its equivalent s'v, we find

p'=s' v
---
C =s' v
---
c+v 

which equation may also be expressed by the proportion

p':s'=v:C;

the rate of profit is related to the rate of surplus-value as the variable capital is 
to the total capital.

Reply via email to