over the years, I've discovered that I have a hard time getting mad at someone because
of their political opinions. If someone is a Malthusian (say), I tend to pity them for
not thinking clearly. But when someone misinterprets what I say -- especially when I
write it down in clear prose that I edit and re-edit (and I even spell-check) -- it
somehow rubs one of my neuroses the wrong way. And then the critic makes many of the
points I did!
BTW, bringing up GT and Nash using a comic novel does not inherently imply a critique
of either. Comic novels can be just as profound as tragic ones. I've seen the
house-of-mirrors analogy in GT books.
While we're on the subject, I think it's worth discussing the role of Nash's madness
(paranoid schizophrenia and, according to a shrink I know, Asperger's Syndrome). One
of the hats I wear is as the father of a kid with mental problems (Asperger's
Syndrome, ADD, maybe bipolar (manic-depressive), maybe psychosis (not otherwise
specified)). One of the things that comes out in the millieu that this role has thrust
me into is that _being crazy ain't all bad and can actually be a good thing_ in some
situations.
Some of the most brilliant people in the world have been stark raving nuts. Einstein
(maybe Asperger's Syndrome, though those with other disorders also claim him) was
hardly a "normal" person. One's madness can give one insights that so-called "normal"
people (neurotypicals) are _totally incapable_ of achieving. People who live
well-adjusted lives in conjunction with others and have no inner turmoil have a hard
time "thinking outside the box" the way Einstein or Nash did. Einstein's Gedanken
(sp?) experiments and Nash's brilliant insight come from non-neurotypical thinking.
I do think that Nash's equilibrium concept was brilliant. However, the concept has
been reified, worshiped and worse. It's the reification that's the problem. That
reflects a deeper problem, the corruption of the social sciences. But I said this
before.
Jim Devine
-----Original Message-----
From: andie nachgeborenen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 5/18/2004 6:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [PEN-L] game theory
>
> > Nash went mad, but you can't
> argue with his maths.<
>
> you can easily argue about the applicability of the
> math. Math doesn't correspond to reality; it only
> represents the abstract dimension.
>
> By the way, Nash is currently deemed sane. And his
> sanity or insanity has nothing to do with the
> validity of the Nash equilibrium concept or of game
> theory.
>
I actually knew Nash a bit when he was mad. The math
majors at Tigetown called him the Ghost of Fine Hall.
He would scrawl brilliant and bitingly hilarious
"formulae" on the blackboards -- not at all like the
merely wacko stuff depicted in the movie, much
funnier. Political too. And not right wing. Apparently
he hated Nixon. That wasn't hard, of course. My friend
(at the time, haven't been in touch in years) Dave
Donoho, now a hotshot stat prof at Stanford, said that
mathematically Nash's crazy "formulae" _almost_ made
sense.
Sorry I teed you off about your post on madness, but
frankly I was surprised to read your remarks about GT
in the context of the Westlake book and your
substantive post -- reread them yourself and see if
you can see how someone might understand the point the
way I did. Of course I know it's easy to be
misconstrued, having had it happy to me a lot. But as
a lawyer I've learned to assume that it's not
necessarily the other guy's fault -- something I for
one at least didn't learn as an academic. Maybe you
have, but if so, given that you know how hard it to be
clear and how easy it is to me misunderstood, maybe it
would be helpful to be less uptight about being
misunderstood even if it is the other guy's fault.
For instance, not that I am a shining examplar of
anything, I said about eight times in my post that GT
was an abstraction, an idealization, and based on
false premises, and yet apparently I still wasn't
clear enough. Still, it's not worth getting mad about
. . . .
jks
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! - Internet access at a great low price.
http://promo.yahoo.com/sbc/
