Trickle down effect

-Clip-
Though Kuznets' "law" seems to describe the process of industrialization in
the U.S., at this point it is past its application, with steady increases in
inequality in wealth and income. Rises in gross domestic product in recent
decades have usually coincided with increases in inequality.

The opposite of this version of the trickle-down effect can be seen in Karl
Marx 's "absolute general law of capitalist accumulation," in which he
posits the normal tendency of economic growth  under capitalism as being
that wages fall behind the growth of labor productivity  . This
"immiseration" tendency implies that the workers' share of the total product
will fall in percentage terms. In recent decades, when this theory fits
better with the empirical data in the United Sates than it did during the
1950s or 1960s, more people have begun to think in these terms (though
probably without citing Marx). For example, people posit a "race to the
bottom," in which wages around the world are being dragged down to the
standards of manufacturing in poor countries (adjusted for differences in
labor productivity). (See Globalization .)

( This reminds of Jim Devine's earlier observation - CB)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trickle_down_effect

Reply via email to