Greetings Economists,
On Apr 25, 2008, at 1:16 PM, raghu wrote:

What can Word 2007 do that Word 1995 could not?

Doyle;
Aside from easy answers like the machines are no longer available to run word 1995, there is no specific way to calculate the changes. This is sort of like Moore's law about transistors doubling every two years.

Every time the chips advance they affect all sorts of ways of doing processing. For reasons of economy an application can't anticipate changes ten years in advance. In thinking about this I think the error is in the concept of 'code' that can't give insight about changes coming. Ubiquitous computing was anticipated in the industry and kinds of 'general' processes can be estimated well in advance. I have various engineering books that anticipate what is coming in a rough way with no specific reference to how code comes along. These show me that trying to understand developments by how coding can be anticipated is very poorly understood. Further there is an uproar about multi-core chips not having practical value because of coding issues.

Many arguments are being made about the next level of coding which automates away from writing code to building as it were sort of architectural building blocks. And so on.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to