Ted Winslow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:00:16 -0400 Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References:X-Mailer; b=YZE7rKb7f9uBMkPwdnpecsWHx8MUBhYembymSK+iPGnpQiPAOunSrw0AK9OuhmSje//tPRC96+bUSCKg8M4O6Geyrw2wvoC1StQ0G+tWFWuY5L2QBT+pWeDJl9S+wwiohy6TqLDdLpHLfGVFYewO615Da8ug6O5xLkUHrP++aGc= ;
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Brown wrote: Isn't the disequilibrium right there in production in that the workers are also the mass of consumers ( at least of personal consumption goods and services). So, with the surplus extracted the workers don't have enough buying power or demand to buy all they produce. We know right there that all the commodities produced can't be bought, that there is overproduction relative to demand. This won't explain overproduction on Marx's premises. ^^^^^ CB: Yes, it does. There is a quote in Vol. 3, ( which I have lost track of) where he says the ultimate cause of all crises of overproduction is what I say above. This message has been scanned for malware by SurfControl plc. www.surfcontrol.com _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
