[email protected] wrote: > > Jim D. wrote: > > > Don't you think these are strong arguments? Permanant nationalization > with haircuts is economically just and provides greater stability. > Even some mainstream folks are starting to concede these arguments > (e.g. Buiter). > > Don't you think we should be making these arguments as much as we can, > in order to try to influence the public discussion, instead of > conceding the public discussion to the mainstream folks?
You would still have a capitalist organization of work, so what difference would it make. And the slogan is absurd. NO legislation, not even any constitutional amendment, is permanent. The very word applied to any action of the state is a serious lie. Carrol _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
