Jim Devine wrote:
[interestingly, the way that the SWP functionary's way of handing
accusations of sexual molestation are exactly the same as the Catholic
Church's.]


Don't believe all the bullshit you read in the NY Times.


I read an excerpt from this stupid book when it appeared in Granta and
posted this comment on it to the swp yahoo (these 2 terms really sort of
go together, don't they?) mailing list:

I can’t remember anything leaving such a bad taste in my mouth as Säid
Sayrafiezadeh's “When Skateboards will be free”. It was almost enough to
make me reapply for membership in the SWP. Almost.

Although Said is not a rightwinger (at least for the time being), it is
clear that he is trying to pull off something like this excerpt from
David Horowitz’s “Radical Son”:

>>The powerful early chapters of the book introduce his parents and
recount his youth as a red-diaper baby. For his father, communism
provided the certainty, self-confidence, and sense of mastery of fate
that he lacked; it promised an end to the alienation that he felt from
his country and, indeed, himself. This made for a strange childhood:
"Almost all conversation in our household was political, other than what
was necessary to advance the business of daily life." Horowitz was
warned off baseball, "a form of capitalist exploitation," and especially
the Yankees, "the ruling class of baseball": "To root for the Yankees,"
as Horowitz furtively did, "was to betray a lack of social consciousness
that was unthinkable for people like us."<<

In fact, the real model for this is the witch-hunt movies of the 1950s
in which the Reds were virtually indistinguishable from the pod people
in “Invasion of the Body Snatchers.” Although I didn’t really know
Said’s parents, I truly doubt that they were as one-dimensional as they
were depicted in his memoir, which I assume is an excerpt from a
full-length book.

If David Horowitz is denied baseball, so poor Said is denied a
skateboard. His mother who seems to have taken a vow of poverty doubts
the need for such a trifle, especially since it would set her back $10
or so. Frankly, this sounds fabricated like much else in this memoir. No
matter how poor his mother was, it seems dubious that she couldn’t
scrape up such a paltry sum. His whole purpose, of course, is to create
a dichotomy between his own desire for normalcy and his parents’ robotic
asceticism.

It is not even reliable as a guide to life inside the SWP, which by this
time had taken on certain “odd” characteristics to put it mildly. Said
informs us that his mother was attending a forum on “Trotsky and the
Fourth International.” As a forum director of the SWP for a number of
years, I can say that anybody who proposed such a topic would have
raised eyebrows. This is especially true in the period that Said covers,
which was marked by a growing disaffection from Trotskyist traditions.

But the worst thing about this venal exercise was the charge he made
about being molested by a baby-sitter while his mother attended the
forum. Said writes that this man “put his hands in my pants and gently
ran his fingers over and around my dick and balls sending a Shockwave
coursing through my four-year-old body.”

When Said’s mother calls the SWP headquarters to tell them that her son
had been molested by a party member, she supposedly is told that “Under
capitalism everybody has problems.” According to Said, “it was left at
that.” So, here we have it. The SWP not only forces children to go
without skateboards, it shrugs it shoulders when they are buggered. What
trash.

Try to imagine such an incident occurring. I can’t. Whatever the faults
of the SWP in this period, it was not likely to tolerate child
molestation. Male SWP members of long standing were expelled for using
violence against their female companions so it is doubtful that sexual
abuse of a four year old would go unpunished.

If the SWP was guilty of anything, it was turning into such a
suffocating cult that the child of two of its members would turn into
such a vengeful fabricator. Let’s hope that in the revolutionary party
of the future we can create an environment where parents and children
can relate to each other normally. I should qualify that by saying as
normal as can be expected in bourgeois society, which the revolutionary
party has to operate in.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to