There are elements of U.S. foreign aid that, if not "implemented by
leftists," are substantially monitored and shaped by progressive
activists.

A good example is the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and
Malaria. This is strongly supported by, greatly shaped by, and heavily
monitored by progressive activists.

I agree that the slogan "Stop all foreign aid" is indefensible. We
should stop bad "foreign aid," like agricultural dumping. Oxfam has a
campaign on this, see

"A Common Sense Food Aid Reform"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ug-8ZJtKR8I

There is a battle looming on plans to increase funding for the
International Monetary Fund. This will be a great opportunity to
attack bad "foreign aid."

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Carrol Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> Carrol wrote: I think OPEN BORDERS is one of those rallying points. A
> four-day week is another. Stop all Foreign Aid a third. All troops
> within the 50 states another. Eliminate the Prison system. And so forth.
> Keep conversation going on such topics within both local organizations
> and national forums.
>
> ehrbar wrote:
>
> Carrol, I don't think the slogan "Stop all foreign aid" is defensible.
> Since the US has historically emitted a huge amount of CO2 into the
> atmosphere, the US owes the developing nations a lot of aid to
> compensate them for the cost of climate change and to help them pursue a
> development path based on renewable energy.  Almost nobody is talking
> about this, this is not part of common consciousness.  If the Left
> promotes the slogan "Stop all foreign aid" they co-operate with this
> conspiracy of silence and put themselves in opposition to the
> necessities dictated by the present climate emergency.  See The
> Greenhouse Development Rights Framework: The Right to Development in a
> Climate Constrained World (executive summary) at
> http://www.ecoequity.org/GDRs/GDRs_ExecSummary.pdf
>
> This is the third time I have enountered this argument though the
> occasion was different each time.
>
> I can't remember the details of the first time, but it involved and
> exchange between me and an ISU professor of political science who had
> been in Nicaraguar shortly before the Sandinistas took power. He thought
> we should urge the U.S. to provide aid to Nicaragua; I suggested that
> the best thing the U.S. could do for Nicaragua was leave it alone. He
> argued vigorously that the country was so poor, the earthquake had done
> so much damage, that they could not possibly survive without u.s. aid.
>
> Well we know that the U.S. sent aid in the form of the Contras.
>
> The second debate on this issue I remember. Shortly aftert the U.S.
> invasion of Iraq there was a discussion on another list over the proper
> position of the anti-war movement. Several writers urged that the left
> pressure the u.s. government to repair the damage it had done before
> leaving. Part of the evidence for this position was a poll in Iraq which
> showed that a large majority of Iraqi citizens held this position, while
> only 14% were for immediate withdrawal. But of course the longer the
> U.S. stays, the greater will be the damage that must be repaired, the
> more likely will be a savage civil wqr after the u.s. departs. The U.S.
> nevere repairs the damage it has done but simply increases the damage.
>
> Really, it has to be understood that U.S. foereign aid always has been,
> is now, and always will be destructive to the people of the nation
> receiving the aid. That aid will not be supervised by leftists, it will
> be implemented by those who believe that Africa is insufficiently
> polluted. U.S. aid under the slogan of renewable clean energy  will in
> practice simply increase the pollution in the nations aided. When
> anything like a coherent left comes into existence in the U.S. it will
> show its solidarity with u.s. victims by a campaign anagainst the u.s
> having anything at all to do with those victims.
>
> Carrol
>
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>



-- 
Robert Naiman
Just Foreign Policy
www.justforeignpolicy.org
[email protected]

"It's 11 AM in Washington. Do you know where your foreign policy is?"
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to