raghu wrote: > I think Ravi was objecting to the tyranny of science. Science in the > 21'st century has become what the Bible was in the middle ages - the > ultimate arbiter of every important question.
it wasn't the "ultimate arbiter" during the late Dubya regime. Instead, the arbiter was "what will help my cronies and help create permanent GOP rule?" Is that the kind of thing you prefer to science being in charge? I doubt it. Science shouldn't be the ultimate arbiter. It should be the democratic organization of the population, hopefully informed by science. -- Jim Devine / "If heart-aches were commercials, we'd all be on TV." -- John Prine _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
