Greetings Economists,
All you do in my view is muddy the waters with your counter argument
against Raghu. I think Michael sums it up best this is merely people
talking past each other trying to find an argument with something that
is really no one is disagreeing with. You call it stupid science as
if by some sort of word game of saying things the right way you have
corrected Raghu. Where is the need to correct Raghu?
Doyle
On May 8, 2009, at 5:53 PM, Doug Henwood wrote:
I wasn't arguing with Ravi, I was arguing with what I quoted from
Raghu. Read the post again.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
