Yes. I merely used "salary committees" as shorthand for appointments,
salary, promotions, tenure, etc.

Carrol

Jim Devine wrote:
> 
> it's not just salary committees but also those making tenure decisions
> (which are much more important).
> 
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Carrol Cox<[email protected]> wrote:
> > Peer review is only important to slary committees -- and I would suspose
> > that different universities may well be more or less rigorous in their
> > definitioon of peer review.
> >
> > Carrol
> >
> > Jim Devine wrote:
> >>
> >> if a journal allows 1 or 2, it's a scandal.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Gar Lipow<[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > A question about what constitutes legitimate peer review?
> >> >
> >> > As I understand it, authors often suggest peer reviewers for their
> >> > work. In fact this is sometimes a requirement for submissions to
> >> > academic presses or refereed journals. However I'm guessing the
> >> > following would not be legitimate.
> >> >
> >> > 1) The authors spouse is the editor (and also a co-author) and has
> >> > final say in selecting the peer reviewers.
> >> >
> >> > 2) The author and the author's spouse control the board of directors
> >> > for the publication, and the editor selecting the peer reviewers knows
> >> > this.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > If I were to run into a case of either 1 or 2, would I be right in
> >> > suggesting that the peer review process was not legitimate? Or is this
> >> > a case where usual professional practices would allow 2?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> >
> >> > Gar
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > pen-l mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jim Devine / "All science would be superfluous if the form of
> >> appearance of things directly coincided with their essence." -- KM
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> pen-l mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pen-l mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
> >
> 
> --
> Jim Devine / "All science would be superfluous if the form of
> appearance of things directly coincided with their essence." -- KM
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to