Doug Henwood writes: >> Except that the U.S. spends far more than any other country on health >> and is rapidly falling behind on educational enrollment and outcomes. >> Aside from that, a fine point.
I didn't say that subsidies cause money to be spent wisely. To the contrary, I was agreeing that the subsidies caused overconsumption. So if we agree that expenditures induced by subsidy will not increase desired outcomes (unless you want to say that overconsumption is the desired outcome, which I assume you don't because you are not a real estate developer, health care provider or a member of a teacher's union), can we not agree that the subsidies are a bad idea? David Shemano _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
