On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Michael Perelman
<[email protected]> wrote:
> It is a repitition.  Part of what Lou said way back in this thread was
> that some crisis (I can't think of a weaker word at this moment) forces
> capitalists to cede some ground in order to maintain control.


Hi Michael,
Don't you think it is a mistake to take the capitalist class as
homogeneous? Surely there is scope for a tactical alliance (with all
the caution that that phrase implies) with the less insane elements of
that class for important reforms like reining in the mad financiers
and having a civilized level of health-care etc?

That, to me, is the key item of contention in this thread. Purists
like Louis may not like it, but I think this is a legitimate question.
-raghu.


-- 
Don't steal; thou'lt never thus be successful in business. Cheat instead!
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to