FWIW, no one in this discussion took the "capitalist class as homogenous."
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 4:07 PM, raghu <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Michael Perelman > <[email protected]> wrote: >> It is a repitition. Part of what Lou said way back in this thread was >> that some crisis (I can't think of a weaker word at this moment) forces >> capitalists to cede some ground in order to maintain control. > > > Hi Michael, > Don't you think it is a mistake to take the capitalist class as > homogeneous? Surely there is scope for a tactical alliance (with all > the caution that that phrase implies) with the less insane elements of > that class for important reforms like reining in the mad financiers > and having a civilized level of health-care etc? > > That, to me, is the key item of contention in this thread. Purists > like Louis may not like it, but I think this is a legitimate question. > -raghu. > > > -- > Don't steal; thou'lt never thus be successful in business. Cheat instead! > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l > -- Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
