My memory is that it was a little more complicated than that.

The Taliban offered to negotiate handing over bin Laden; e.g., show us
some evidence, try him in a neutral third country. The Bush
Administration rejected this: hand him over unconditionally or else.

That leaves the NYT some room for maneuver on the "sheltering" claim.

More important, though, I think is the question of how much weight
whatever the Taliban did or didn't do in 2001 should have against the
idea of negotiations now (basically zero, I would argue.)

The US does not believe that OBL is in Afghanistan now; anything that
the US wants vis-a-vis the Taliban and OBL/al Qaeda can be on the
table for negotiations; whatever their relationship in the past,
Mullah Omar has strongly indicated that he doesn't have any issues
with the US outside of Afghanistan; people close to the Taliban have
been saying for some time that they accept the legitimate security
interests of the United States relative to Afghanistan (not being
attacked from there.)

If someone really argues that whatever the Taliban did or didn't do
relative to OBL in 2001 should be an obstacle to negotiations now,
then what they're saying is that it's all about revenge. And that
isn't a just or sane basis for policy going forward; the human costs
are too high, particular for those who have little or no say.

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 4:06 AM, Bill Lear <[email protected]> wrote:
> My understanding of the relationship between Al Qaida, Osama bin
> Laden, and the Taliban was that the Taliban was not terribly friendly
> with Al Qaida, and did not "shelter" bin Laden after 9/11.  However,
> this is stated as an assumption in an article in the NY Times today by
> Mark Landler and Helene Cooper:
>
>    As the U.S. government pours additional troops into Afghanistan, it
>    has begun grappling with whether to reconcile with those who sheltered
>    Osama bin Laden.
>
> If I remember correctly, the Taliban offered to work with the United
> States to hand over bin Laden, but the U.S. rejected the overture.
>
> Am I remembering things incorrectly?
>
>
> Bill
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>



-- 
Robert Naiman
Just Foreign Policy
www.justforeignpolicy.org
[email protected]

Change.org: End the war in Afghanistan
Timeline for Withdrawal and Political Negotiations
http://www.change.org/ideas/view/end_the_war_in_afghanistan_establish_a_timeline_for_withdrawal_and_begin_political_negotiations
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to