raghu <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Doug Henwood <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Jan 27, 2010, at 1:18 PM, Dan Scanlan wrote: >> >>> On Jan 27, 2010, at 9:31 AM, Michael Perelman wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> The Taliban asked for evidence that bin Laden was guilty before handing >>>> him over. Concerns about evidence would diminish presidential >>>> authority, so the offer was rejected. >>> >>> Evidence? What evidence? We don't need no stinking evidence! Just control >>> of the national chatter. >> >> Does anyone believe that Osama didn't have anything to do with 9/11? > > > > Or that the Taliban were being sincere in their negotiations about 'evidence'? > > The one good thing Bush's war achieved was getting rid of that > outfit..
Yeah, thank goodness we're rid of them... http://www.groundreport.com/World/General-McChrystal-Talibans-participation-in-the-f_1/2916735 "Taliban's participation in future government may be part of solution in Afghanistan." -- In Solidarity, Billy O'Connor _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
