On Jan 27, 2010, at 1:18 PM, Dan Scanlan wrote:
On Jan 27, 2010, at 9:31 AM, Michael Perelman wrote:
The Taliban asked for evidence that bin Laden was guilty before
handing
him over. Concerns about evidence would diminish presidential
authority, so the offer was rejected.
Evidence? What evidence? We don't need no stinking evidence! Just
control of the national chatter.
Does anyone believe that Osama didn't have anything to do with 9/11?
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
