That war was lost some time ago. Or maybe it was won so that all U.S. resources have been withdrawn from the battle.
Cheers, k hanly Blog: http://kenthink7.blogspot.com/index.html Blog: http://kencan7.blogspot.com/index.html --- On Wed, 4/7/10, Jim Devine <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Jim Devine <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Pen-l] drones > To: "Progressive Economics" <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 9:30 PM > how about the war on poverty? > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:44 PM, ken hanly <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The justification of these attacks is self-defense > and the laws of war that the targets are supposedly > combatants. Nations per se are not involved. This is the war > on terror. I have always been bothered by the fact that the > legal discussion of drones assumes that because the war on > terror is called a war the laws of war apply. It would be > interesting if the same reasoning were used to target drug > dealers, or murderers as part of the war on drugs or war on > crime.< > -- > Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." > (Go your own > way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante. > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l > _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
