Bob Pollin and Stephanie Luce have a book on the subject: The Living
Wage: Building a Fair Economy.

see also: A Measure of Fairness: The Economics of Living Wages and
Minimum Wages in the United States by Robert Pollin (Author), Mark
Brenner (Author), Jeannette Wicks-lim (Author), Stephanie Luce
(Author); and

Fighting for a Living Wage (Ilr Press Book) by Stephanie Luce.

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Paul Bartlett <[email protected]> wrote:
> This study needs a thorough public critique. It would be faster and most
> credible if we assemble a group of economists to do so. I am overloaded with
> other projects, but could help and do my part.
>
> Living Wage Would Kill Jobs, Cost Billions, Bloomberg Report Claims
>
> By Chris
> Bragghttp://www.cityhallnews.com/newyork/article-1879-living-wage-would-kill-jobs-cost-billions-bloomberg-report-claims.html
>
> A living wage mandate for New York employers would stifle development, cost
> tens of thousands of jobs, and sacrifice billions of dollars worth of
> private investment in the decades to come, a controversial new study claims.
>
> The long-awaited report from the city’s Economic Development Corporation
> shows the City Council is pushing for the country’s most far-reaching living
> wage protection, and says low-skilled workers would be disproportionally hit
> by job losses.
>
> “The most comprehensive study to date on the effect of living wage policy
> shows that significant job losses accompany modest wage gains among
> low-skilled workers,” said EDC spokesman David Lombino in a statement.
> “For New York City, the study projects that the job loss would be even more
> significant than other cities, and that many development projects,
> particularly in areas outside Manhattan, would not move forward.”
>
> The study was performed by the Boston-based firm Charles River Associates.
>
> The living wage bill, sponsored by Council Member Oliver Koppell, would
> require all employers in developments that receive more than $100,000 in
> city subsidies to pay workers $10-per-hour if the employer pays health care
> benefits, or $11.50 an hour if they do not.
>
> Those conditions would apply to almost every commercial building in the
> outer boroughs, said one person involved in the study, forcing almost every
> business in them to pay a higher wage – making it much more sweeping than
> laws in other cities.
>
> For months, proponents of the living wage bill, which include the unions
> RWDSU and 32 BJ, have anticipated that the $1 million EDC-funded study would
> show that the bill would kill jobs and cost private investment.
>
> One of the authors of the EDC study, Dr. David Neumark of
> the University of California at Irvine, has been accused by proponents of
> the bill as having a long history releasing reports slanted against the
> adoption of wage mandates.
>
> "The core question here is why New York can’t do what Los Angeles and San
> Francisco have been doing for years: ask major businesses that receive
> taxpayer-funded benefits to pay a living wage in return," said Paul Sonn,
> legal co-director at the Washington, D.C.-based National Employment Law
> Project, who authored the city's living wage bill.
>
> Mayor Michael Bloomberg is already on record as being against the bill, and
> spokesman Andrew Brent said the new report confirms why the mayor opposes
> it.
>
> “The biggest job losses would occur in the areas with the highest
> unemployment at a time when too many New Yorkers are without jobs as it is,”
> Brent said. “Aggregate wages among low-skilled workers would not change
> because any gains among some workers would be more than offset by families
> losing employment opportunities entirely.”
>
> The living-wage bill is gearing up to be the next major clash between
> progressives and the Bloomberg administration, following the death of the
> paid-sick-leave bill, which Council Speaker Christine Quinn shelved
> following a study funded by the Partnership for New York City that showed
> the legislation would cost the city $789 million annually.
>
> Quinn has not yet indicated whether she will allow the living wage bill to
> the Council floor or whether she will support the legislation. The details
> of the EDC study have emerged in advance of a Thursday hearing on the bill.
> The authors are not expected to testify.
>
> Policy experts who favor the living wage bill are already working on a
> rebuttal pointing out purported methodological flaws and miscalculations in
> the EDC study.
>
> Bettina Damiani, project director for Good Jobs New York, said it was
> disappointing the city spent $1 million in taxpayers money to reaffirm the
> real estate lobby's position on living wage.
>
> "If working New Yorkers can’t count on earning a living wage," she said,
> "what policy recommendations does the Bloomberg Administration plan to put
> forward to lift workers out of poverty?"
>
> A copy of the full 400-page study will likely be released in full this
> summer.
>
> Living Wage Exec Summary_2011 05 09
>
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>
>



-- 
Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own
way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to