On 2011-08-04, at 3:54 PM, Louis Proyect wrote:

> On 8/4/2011 3:43 PM, Doug Henwood wrote:
>> Lincoln and FDR were produced by a society that was rising in wealth and 
>> power. Obama is the product of a society that's rotting.
>> 
> 
> Doug's point is essential. The attack on 
> the New Deal gains that date back to Carter and continue and even 
> deepen under Obama are not to be understood by looking at the 
> mindset of a politician. Nixon did what he did because the USA was 
> still a rising power and he could toss some crumbs from the table. 
> Today's Counterpunch article that I forwarded here is excellent 
> because it looks at Obama's rightwing policies in a global 
> context. I dare say that if FDR was elected in 2008, he'd be doing 
> the same thing.

This sounds like Charles B's line. He and others have also argued there is no 
basis for vehement criticism of the the Obama administration since it is 
constrained by objective forces beyond its control, and has had no other 
options within the framework of US capitalism other than to opt for the 
policies which it has chosen. Which raises the question: If such modest reforms 
as were being pressed on the administration by its critics, including within 
the ruling class - for "public option" healthcare; for stimulus primarily aimed 
at direct job creation; for elimination of the Bush tax cuts; for stricter 
regulation of the financial industry; for changes to the NLRA modeled on the 
Canadian industrial relations regime; for mortgage relief to homeowners - if 
such reforms are no longer realizable in the US because of the "global context" 
or what others see as the chronic susceptibility of the US organized working 
class to manipulation by the Democratic party, what possibility is the!
 re for more fundamental change to the system, and why bother with politics at 
all? 

While it is true the mindset of an individual politician is not decisive, there 
is typically debate within ruling classes between liberals and conservatives 
about how to respond to a crisis, and there are many examples of ruling class 
politicians, both in opposition and in power, in both rising and declining 
societies, who have mobilized their own supporters in pursuit of systemic 
changes which were deemed necessary. The Obama administration was not above 
such intra-class debate, and other policy options were not foreclosed to it.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to