Robert Naiman wrote:
> Ironically, Iran has been reducing its fuel consumption subsidies,
> something it has long wanted to do on economic grounds, under the
> pressure of US-led sanctions. In fact, US sanctions gave them a
> nationalist excuse to do what they wanted to do anyway. An interesting
> case study in "Pareto improvement."
>
> Also interesting is that Iran had a careful plan for reducing the
> subsidies in a way that would not cause widespread social unrest. Part
> of it was replacing the subsidy by direct payments - just as classical
> economics would suggest  - and part of it was starting the curtailment
> at the margin, so as to have maximum effect with minimum pain....

FWIW, a friend of mine from Iran suggests that the Ahmadinejad
government's giving of direct payments to peasants and other poor
people is a way of buying votes!
-- 
Jim Devine / It's time to Occupy the New Year!
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to