I have no theory of primitive accumulation. I was only showing how early economists avoided the subject of primitive accumulation.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Lakshmi Rhone <[email protected]> wrote: > Slavery is referred to but plays no real role in your theory of primitive > accumulation, Michael. Astonishing. One still has to make sense of why you > would chastise me when I responded to Angelus with much milder language than > he used against me. Much milder. But as a good colonial you won't stand in > the way of unfairness towards the other. > And no Shane children are not made formally free by parents selling their > children's labor power. Moreover, mature capitalism is not free of formally > unfree labor. For example so called illegal immigrants are held in debt > bondage in orchards in the US. > > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l > -- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929 530 898 5321 fax 530 898 5901 http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
