Jim Devine writes:

"Except at low incomes, tax cuts are fiscally inefficient, i.e., they
stimulate aggregate spending less per dollar of increased deficit than
do increases in government purchases (on weapons, schools, etc.) Put a
different way, they increase the deficit more per dollar of stimulus."

Is your statement purely a logical result of theorems you accept, or are there 
empirical studies you believe are compelling and conclusive?  And if the 
latter, which studies?

David Shemano
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to