I wrote:
> it's a very  good video! but I was amused by the idea that opposition
> to Ralph Nader mobilized the gazillionaires during the 1970s to take
> over politics, etc. He may have been symbolic of they hated then, but
> we should also remember the steep fall in average profitability going
> from the 1960s into the 1970s. That plus inflation (which initially
> hurts those with money) helped create the "Volcker-Reagan" policy
> revolution (that started under Carter, BTW) and all that followed. And
> to some extent, these folks were backed by white men (even of the
> working class) who felt threatened by the civil rights movement,
> feminism, etc.

I wanted to add that even though the Koch brothers and similar
plutocrats helped fuel the Tea Party, it also represents a standard
form of petty-bourgeois discontent. Though this movie is accurate, it
leaves out a lot of the structural dimensions of the problem, to focus
on individual actors. It also missed the role of the mainstream media
as cheerleaders.
-- 
Jim Devine /  "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your
own way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to