It's an uninformed smear to claim that the support for Hagel was based merely on the fact that Obama nominated him.
Council for a Livable World: supported Hagel, not Brennan. Ploughshares: supported Hagel, not Brennan. Just Foreign Policy: supported Hagel, not Brennan. J Street: supported Hagel, not Brennan Americans for Peace Now: supported Hagel, not Brennan. Friends Committee on National Legislation: supported Hagel, not Brennan. Jewish Voice for Peace: supported Hagel, not Brennan. It's a shame that the interest level in truth of much of the ideological left is about at the same level as that of the Weekly Standard and the National Enquirer. On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Michael Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:57:49 -0600 > Robert Naiman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Is this a credible smear? Are the people whom you loathe who supported >> Hagel also supporting John Brennan? > > They will if the Republicans line up against him. Whaddya wanna bet? > It's all a question of team spirit with these people. > > Oh, and 'smear'? I realize that one often writes on autopilot, > but who exactly is being 'smeared' here, and with what? > > I'm off to smear my own elderly shins with Eucerin lotion. > Damn dry air in the winter. > > > -- > -- > > Michael J. Smith > [email protected] > > http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org > http://fakesprogress.blogspot.com > http://cars-suck.org > > 'I'm not so sure about the Divisionnaire. He > might just possibly have a soul. There's something > unhappy about him.' > > 'Is that always a sign?' > > 'I think it is.' > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l -- Robert Naiman Policy Director Just Foreign Policy www.justforeignpolicy.org [email protected] _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
