On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:13:40 -0600 Robert Naiman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, if you won't accept the current exchange as evidence of the > fact, what would you accept as evidence? Evidence of what, exactly? Evidence that there are things liberals would balk at from Obama? Some real balking would be evidence. A slight diminution of enthusiasm, in some particularly egregious case, doesn't quite count. -- -- Michael J. Smith [email protected] http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org http://fakesprogress.blogspot.com http://cars-suck.org 'I'm not so sure about the Divisionnaire. He might just possibly have a soul. There's something unhappy about him.' 'Is that always a sign?' 'I think it is.' _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
