I would tend to agree with Marv here. At this year's Labor Notes conference
Jan noticed an important shift from Labor Notes conferences and paper: In
the past the emphasis has always been on (mere?) _militancy_ of union work.
This year the conference focused continuously of unions _reaching_ out to
the whole community. For example, a speaker from NYC told of plans of bus
drivers to reach out to their passengers on a question of shared concern:
Safety. Also -- since the great wildcat strike of 1970, through which postal
workers gained bargaining rights, the _four_ separate postal unions (the
separation being grounded on past trade divisions) are for the first time
talking to one another and, more importantly, the unifying principle has
been to reach out to community groups: to unite with local social movements.
This goes far beyond the (mere?) militancy which in the past has been the
high point of union work. The Chicago Teachers and the California nurses
seem to have been the forerunners of this trend.

Carrol

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marv Gandall
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 10:32 AM
To: LBO; Pen-L Economics
Subject: Re: [Pen-l] good article by Gregg Shotwell

On 2014-04-14, at 4:19 PM, michael yates wrote:

> I would be interested to know what people think of Gregg's article.
> 
> http://monthlyreview.org/2014/04/01/practical-solution-urgent-need


It's well written and Shotwell is clearly a good militant trade unionist
with a wealth of experience behind him, but I would hesitate to say the
following constitutes a "practical solution to an urgent need" rather than
another left-winger's longing for a revival of working class political and
industrial action and a simple formula to provide it.

"We need somewhere to go and something to do and something to join besides a
study group, the occupation of a park, or passive participation in a Roberts
Ruled bureaucracy. We need to organize a union that unifies rather than
alienates the rank and file; a union with a fist connected to an arm
connected to a shoulder connected to a body of people who are willing to
fight for economic justice, fight for the integrity of labor, fight for the
dignity of all working people in that place where effective class struggle
inevitably begins: the workplace."

Shotwell believes the solution in this case is for committed young radicals
to implant themselves in unions. But unions are rarely organized nor turned
in a new direction in this way, or at least haven't been since the 30's. The
current condition of the labour market militates against militancy, or for
that matter of even getting jobs in unionized enterprises or sectors ripe
for unionization. To the extent the strategy diverts people from other
possibilities which present themselves outside the workplace, this isn't
particularly a good thing. 

That said, this form of sustained contact with the working class and its
organizations will almost always contribute more to the political education
and skills of young radicals than if their political activity is limited to
study groups of like-minded individuals and irregular campaigning in support
of causes at home and abroad. So for this reason alone, whatever my
reservations about its effectiveness as a "strategy" in present
circumstances, I certainly wouldn't discourage anyone from trying to find
work in a unionized firm or public institution or from participating in a
union organizing drive. Few who have done so have regretted it even if the
results have fallen far short of their expectations. 
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l


_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to