On another list, I said this: 

Fredrik deBoer says, 


"Left-wing publishing, for good and bad, is defined in large measure 

by a particular social and cultural group. And that group has little 

use for issues of class that aren’t ancillary to issues of race and 

gender. Just check the publishing records of the popular left. Find 

how many of them concern, say, the destitute white underclass of the 

Appalachian mountains. You won’t find many!" 


Michael Yates said:


"This seems patently false to me. I asked deBoer about it and he admitted 

that this is overboard. But then why say it except to make points 

against the person to whose essay deBoer's piece is directed? And 

what might the "popular left" be? Popular to whom? "Defined in large 

measure"? "A particular social and cultural group"? "the Appalachian 

mountains"? Not much specificity here. Those mountains go from southern 

NY to Alabama, Georgia, and Mississippi. That's a pretty big area 

(and about 25 million people) to be writing about "the destitute 

white underclass." What is an "underclass" anyway?" 


Joseph Catron replied, in part:


"Sure, anything you can say will be a generalization. That's why, 

as opposed to deBoer, I'd count a certain approach to it as an 

active bias, not simple disregard. 

'

Then again, you can't say much about urban black America, or 

Indian reservations, without generalizing either. People still 

manage to find intelligent things to say." 


To which Michael Yates:


"Joseph Catron says we can't say much about people on Indian 

reservations or urban black people. Well, that's not quite true. 

We can say what unemployment rates are at Pine Ridge or what 

fraction of people have diabetes, etc. Or we could take the 

poverty rate among blacks in Pittsburgh. Etc. There is plenty 

we can find out from census data. So when you write something 

like deBoer did, he could at least give a concrete example. 

He could look and discover that certain counties in Eastern 

Kentucky are among the poorest in the country, with high incidences 

of poverty, unemployment, obesity, and other things. And the race 

of the residents. If you don't try to be at least somewhat 

specific in trying to make some more general point, no matter 

the venue in which you are writing, then what you have is 

really what I call "bar talk." Great for twitter and facebook 

maybe but not if you claim to be a writer whose field is social 

science. deBoer is young, so he'll hopefully learn this. 

Carrol can't stand vague and therefore meaningless words. 

Nor can I. But to each his own, I suppose.


And isn't it a stereotype, the very thing deBoer is decrying, 

to write about a white underclass in the Appalachian Mts. 

Under what class? The white people in Pigeon Forge, TN are

working in the scores of motels, restaurants, and other 

tourist businesses. Dollywood along must employ hundreds 

of people. Even those out poaching ginseng in the national 

park are working. Even people peddling dope are working. 

There are plenty of places where life is harsh, but it is 

not the case that no one tries to do anything about it." 

____________________________________


Let me add a couple more points. The article deBoer criticizes 

is by Peter Frase, a graduate student like deBoer (deBoer 

might now have obtained his PhD). Frase's essay is remarkably 

self-referential and gives no hint at all that the author has had 

experience with the things he is writing about. deBoer, on the 

other hand, criticizes a group of people (not concretely identified)

who attended fancy colleges and are condescending toward poor 

white people. How does he know this? He makes claims that are  

unsupported. 


Between the two essays, if you can call them that, there is 

not an abundance of substance.  As an antidote to this stuff, read 

Alexandra Early's article on mrzine about why Salvadoran kids are 

coming, unattended, to the U.S. Clear language, good examples, 

some personal experience, etc. Or look at what someone like 

Nastarin Mohit (whose father, an Iranian dissident, used to 

come to the Wed. lunches at Monthly Review) is doing.If I had to 

bet, I'd say that these two young women and many others like 

them will do good things in terms of trying to build radical forces 

to challenge capitalism. The grad students, well, I am not too 

optimistic about them. But, quién sabe?


Finally, there have been many acts of racial solidarity in those 

Appalachian Mts., notably among coal miners in the United Mine Workers.         
                                  
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to