Make that $11.35 an hour just so the wage increase is double that of the $10.67 rate.
--- tom walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is a simple illustration of what I will > euphemistically call the no-cut-in-pay fallacy. > > Let's say the current wage is $10 an hour for a 40 > hour standard week. > > Which would be a better outcome of contract > negotiations: a 37.5-hour week at $10.67 an hour or > a > 32-hour week at $11.25 an hour? > > The wage increase for the 32-hour week would be > twice > as large as for the 37.5-hour week and the reduction > in working time would be more than three times > larger. > > But the 37.5-hour week meets the "no cut in pay" > criteria and the 32-hour week doesn't. > > The Sandwichman > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
