Not really. I did not say that it was right or wrong, just not surprising; then suggested some factors that might account for the result. I cannot keep up with my present backlog of reading, so I am unlikely to go into a paper that does not sound that interesting.
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 06:03:36PM -0400, Doug Henwood wrote: > Wouldn't it be a good idea to read the paper before commenting on it? > - Doug -- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929 Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu michaelperelman.wordpress.com
