Sure. Two other people were becoming a bit feisty -- out of character for both. I thought that your post yesterday represented a good summary of the discussion.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 03:41:11PM -0700, Jim Devine wrote: > how about my point about "efficiency" (Kaldor-Hicks, Pareto), i.e., > that before we talk about it, it should be defined. > > On 6/26/07, Michael Perelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is getting too nasty to continue. You are talking past one another. > > Let's > > drop it. > -- > Jim Devine / "Bong Hits 4 Jesus." -- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929 Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu michaelperelman.wordpress.com
