On 9/15/07, sartesian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What's simple and stark is that the relation between profits and "the > general welfare" is inverse; has become inverted. And to explain that, > we need economic, social, historical, Marxist analysis, not natural, > geological, catastrophe scenarios. >
I'm not seeing the "...natural, geological, catastrophe scenarios." you speak of, in this article. Although without economic, social, historical analysis of a socially humane nature (...and Stan Goff, as I do, rejects so-called 'Marxist analysis' as having a terminally flawed implementation in, at least, American society), that other group of catastrophic events are quite likely, quite soon. Leigh
