On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 23:14 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote: > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 23:08 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote: > >> > >> Are you suggesting you add some padding the PEBS raw sample you > >> return as PERF_SAMPLE_RAW? Then you need to define what RAW > >> actually means? Seems here, it would mean more than what the > >> HW returns. > > > > Well, RAW doesn't mean anything much at all, its really a fugly pass > > some crap around thing. > > > > So yeah, adding padding seems just fine. > > > I would rather see size as u64. Who's using raw today anyway?
the tracepoint stuff does ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ perfmon2-devel mailing list perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel