Patch applied.

Why do you think we should rename that file?

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:23 PM, William Cohen <wco...@redhat.com> wrote:
> I took a quick look at the libpfm4.spec file in libpfm4. It probably should 
> be named libpfm.spec instead. Ran rpmlint over the libpfm4.spec and got the 
> following warning:
>
> $ rpmlint libpfm4.spec
> libpfm4.spec:45: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build make 
> install_prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix}
> libpfm4.spec:13: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 13, tab: line 
> 4)
> libpfm4.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: libpfm-4.1.0.tar.gz
> 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
>
>
> The spec file also needed a "buildrequires: swig".  The attached patch 
> eliminates those rpmlint warnings and puts in the required build dependency.
>
> -Will
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model
> configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and
> the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free
> download at:  http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> perfmon2-devel mailing list
> perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K
The only unified storage solution that offers unified management 
Up to 160% more powerful than alternatives and 25% more efficient. 
Guaranteed. http://p.sf.net/sfu/emc-vnx-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
perfmon2-devel mailing list
perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel

Reply via email to