On 11/04/2013 12:20 PM, Vince Weaver wrote: > Hello > > here's an updated version of the arm64 patch. > > This version does not have any separate "arm64" naming, it just uses > ARM_ARMv8. In theory you can boot a 32-bit kernel on an armv8 machine > so the 64-bit distinction isn't needed anyway. > > This new patch also specifically targets the ARM Foundation simulator. > In theory once the Cortex A53 and Cortex A57 documentation is released > it will be easy enough to add the proper part numbers to the detection > routines. > > Signed-off-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.wea...@maine.edu>
Hi Vince, Should there be something in tests/validate_arm.c for the armv8? -Will ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ perfmon2-devel mailing list perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel
