Philip J. Mucci wrote:
Hi Will,
Good show...regarding the events...ONe thing I've noticed in my tests is
to exercise the code that handles umasks and the code that handles
events without umasks. The problem is the same though...code for
generating events of a certain type...But I suppose we could prototype
something for AMD64 and/or Montecito.
Phil
So something that exercises the different code paths in libpfm? Also makes sure
that umasks are not being ignored or only set the default value.
-Will
_______________________________________________
perfmon mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/perfmon/
