Exactly...I had this problem in PAPI quite a bit... Phil
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 09:41 -0500, William Cohen wrote: > Philip J. Mucci wrote: > > Hi Will, > > > > Good show...regarding the events...ONe thing I've noticed in my tests is > > to exercise the code that handles umasks and the code that handles > > events without umasks. The problem is the same though...code for > > generating events of a certain type...But I suppose we could prototype > > something for AMD64 and/or Montecito. > > > > Phil > > So something that exercises the different code paths in libpfm? Also makes > sure > that umasks are not being ignored or only set the default value. > > -Will > _______________________________________________ > perfmon mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/perfmon/ _______________________________________________ perfmon mailing list [email protected] http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/perfmon/
