Philip Mucci wrote:
Hi folks,
Hapy Holidays. In regards to this subject, I sent a message asking if we
could standardize the PLM levels to actually mean something. In this
way, we don't have to change code for every processor depending on the
PLM mapping. In my private code, I have already changed MIPS to work in
accordance with the others, thus allowing the oprofile code to work.
Does this definition also include masks for hypervisor/non-hypervisor? This is
going to be coming up on processors.
BTW, I have oprofile and perfmon working on i386 again with lots of
patches. Interested?
OProfile has kernel and user space masks. How does this differ from the current
implementation on OProfile? Maybe the easies thing would be to see the patches.
-Will
_______________________________________________
perfmon mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/perfmon/
