Do we really want traditional multi-user for personal storage? Would blockchain consensus be more in-line with the merkle tree and claims based storage at keeping multi-user complexity at bay. Thus Perkeep patterned more as an IPFS private storage system than a traditional multi-user database (which was not designed for selective distributed sharing).
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 7:35 AM Senthil Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: > I have a newbie question, would it be possible to host perkeep as a > storage for multiuser/multi-Tenent applications, planning to build a > perkeep based mobile app in a software as a service business model > > Kind regards > Senthil Kumar > > > > On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 1:52 AM Dirk Sperrle <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Mathieu, >> >> Thank you for the insights. >> >> For me this sounds promising for a starting point :-) >> >> > [...] However, we haven't done anything in particular yet to make >> Perkeep multi-user, so as of now they are some gaps in the implementation >> that >> probably wouldn't let you make it work like that >> >> So at the moment this would result in a per user instance? Would be a >> fair starting point. >> >> >> . have a workflow with auto tagging >> > I don't really know what that means. >> >> The idea behind this is for example, to automatically/periodically scan >> all new images and process the EXIF data, creating tags based on found >> geodata. If no auto tagging could be done, mark the image as todo to be >> manually tagged. >> >> I don't expect to have this implemented yet, but to have an API where a >> self written service can connect to and will be able to perform above steps. >> >> Is there an API endpoint available, to connect e.g. with python or golang? >> >> >> From what I understood, it should be possible to have a search page >> showing objects with a "todo" tag, so this should be fine. >> >> >> Regards, >> Dirk >> >> >> >> Mathieu Lonjaret <[email protected]> schrieb am Sa., 25. Aug. >> 2018, 03:11: >> >>> On 24 August 2018 at 23:05, Dirk Sperrle <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> [...] >> >> >>> >>> None of this seems in disagreement with Perkeep model and mechanism, >>> in theory. However, we haven't done anything in particular yet to make >>> Perkeep multi-user, so as of now they are some gaps in the >>> implementation that probably wouldn't let you make it work like that >>> >>> >>> > Nice to have >>> > . sharing of objects based on tagging, i.e. share all photos with tag >>> family to all family group members >>> >>> both tagging and sharing work. So you should be able to search >>> whatever tag, and then select the results, and share them >>> specifically. >>> >>> > . automatically upload new images from smartphone to perkeep when at >>> home. >>> >>> Yes, we have an android app that does that. >>> >>> > . have a workflow with auto tagging >>> >>> I don't really know what that means. >>> >>> > . force a manual workflow to tag new objects if auto tagging has no >>> high confidence >>> >>> you can tag permanodes in the same time as you upload them, with the >>> command-line tools. >>> >>> > . integration into music player daemon - having mpd access the stored >>> an shared music >>> >>> I don't know how mpd works. if it works with files, then you might be >>> able to make it work with the FUSE interface that mounts your >>> permanodes as a filesystem. >>> >>> > . logically linked images in different quality levels >>> >>> yes, you could tag them together. or group them in a set, etc. >>> >>> > Thanks in advance for your ideas! >>> > Regards >>> > Dirk >>> >>> hth, >>> Mathieu >>> >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Perkeep" group. >>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Perkeep" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Perkeep" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Perkeep" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Perkeep" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
