I don't think there's any plan for now at how to implement multi-user, except probably the existing "user == gpg key identity" relation as the basis of it all. So, maybe?
On 25 August 2018 at 18:52, clive boulton <[email protected]> wrote: > Do we really want traditional multi-user for personal storage? > > Would blockchain consensus be more in-line with the merkle tree and claims > based storage at keeping multi-user complexity at bay. Thus Perkeep > patterned more as an IPFS private storage system than a traditional > multi-user database (which was not designed for selective distributed > sharing). > > On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 7:35 AM Senthil Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I have a newbie question, would it be possible to host perkeep as a >> storage for multiuser/multi-Tenent applications, planning to build a perkeep >> based mobile app in a software as a service business model >> >> Kind regards >> Senthil Kumar >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 1:52 AM Dirk Sperrle <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Mathieu, >>> >>> Thank you for the insights. >>> >>> For me this sounds promising for a starting point :-) >>> >>> > [...] However, we haven't done anything in particular yet to make >>> > Perkeep multi-user, so as of now they are some gaps in the implementation >>> > that probably wouldn't let you make it work like that >>> >>> So at the moment this would result in a per user instance? Would be a >>> fair starting point. >>> >>> >> . have a workflow with auto tagging >>> > I don't really know what that means. >>> >>> The idea behind this is for example, to automatically/periodically scan >>> all new images and process the EXIF data, creating tags based on found >>> geodata. If no auto tagging could be done, mark the image as todo to be >>> manually tagged. >>> >>> I don't expect to have this implemented yet, but to have an API where a >>> self written service can connect to and will be able to perform above steps. >>> >>> Is there an API endpoint available, to connect e.g. with python or >>> golang? >>> >>> >>> From what I understood, it should be possible to have a search page >>> showing objects with a "todo" tag, so this should be fine. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Dirk >>> >>> >>> >>> Mathieu Lonjaret <[email protected]> schrieb am Sa., 25. Aug. >>> 2018, 03:11: >>>> >>>> On 24 August 2018 at 23:05, Dirk Sperrle <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> [...] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> None of this seems in disagreement with Perkeep model and mechanism, >>>> in theory. However, we haven't done anything in particular yet to make >>>> Perkeep multi-user, so as of now they are some gaps in the >>>> implementation that probably wouldn't let you make it work like that >>>> >>>> >>>> > Nice to have >>>> > . sharing of objects based on tagging, i.e. share all photos with tag >>>> > family to all family group members >>>> >>>> both tagging and sharing work. So you should be able to search >>>> whatever tag, and then select the results, and share them >>>> specifically. >>>> >>>> > . automatically upload new images from smartphone to perkeep when at >>>> > home. >>>> >>>> Yes, we have an android app that does that. >>>> >>>> > . have a workflow with auto tagging >>>> >>>> I don't really know what that means. >>>> >>>> > . force a manual workflow to tag new objects if auto tagging has no >>>> > high confidence >>>> >>>> you can tag permanodes in the same time as you upload them, with the >>>> command-line tools. >>>> >>>> > . integration into music player daemon - having mpd access the stored >>>> > an shared music >>>> >>>> I don't know how mpd works. if it works with files, then you might be >>>> able to make it work with the FUSE interface that mounts your >>>> permanodes as a filesystem. >>>> >>>> > . logically linked images in different quality levels >>>> >>>> yes, you could tag them together. or group them in a set, etc. >>>> >>>> > Thanks in advance for your ideas! >>>> > Regards >>>> > Dirk >>>> >>>> hth, >>>> Mathieu >>>> >>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> > Groups "Perkeep" group. >>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> > an email to [email protected]. >>>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Perkeep" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Perkeep" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Perkeep" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Perkeep" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Perkeep" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
