> I would be happy enough with a quintessential
> general AI program that ran 20
> or even a 100 times slower than optimal. Upon
> completion I'm sure the beast
> would rewrite itself on the fly in assembly, and
> dawn a new chapter in
> history. If we're ever going to get there, we've
> got to stick to the
> subject.
:-)
okay, if this is how people feel (and want this to
branch) can we please create a (temporary perhaps)
email list - via addressbook is ok - where we can
discuss supercompilers in relation to perl/perl-ai?
whoever wants to take the initiative just provide an
email address for us to subscribe/use ..
=====
perl -00lane 'for(map{$F[rand($>*($(%10*$$*$(%10+$%*$=))]} @F){last if @a > 5;push @a,
/(\S{1,5}.)/} push @a, @F[rand($>*($$%10*$=)/5),rand(2*($(%10*$=))] for
0..rand($))%10;print "\n",$a=pop @a,"\n","-" x length($a);while(@a){print join " ",
splice(@a,rand($#a+1),rand($))%10)}' /usr/dict/words #new, slightly improved, less
Aarhus
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
