Tom Fawcett wrote: > > guinevere liberty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If we're voting (apologies if we're not) then add my name - and some friends > > of mine too - to the list of pro this thread, i think it is both related and > > interesting. > > All: No need to stop, I'm apparently the only one who cares. No you're not. I for one am sick of this thread. Not only has it nothing to do with AI in particular (it could easily live on clp.misc), but also, nothing substantial is being said about it. People are just expressing their opinions on how feasible or useful it's likely to be. Waste of bandwidth, imho. -- John Porter
- Re: Supercompiled Perl Valentin Turchin
- Re: Supercompiled Perl Jordan Dimov
- Re: Supercompiled Perl Valentin Turchin
- Re: Supercompiled Perl Jordan Dimov
- Re: Supercompiled Perl Tom Fawcett
- Re: Supercompiled Perl Jordan Dimov
- RE: Supercompiled Perl Joe Schulman
- Re: Supercompiled Perl Simon Cozens
- RE: Supercompiled Perl guinevere liberty
- RE: Supercompiled Perl Tom Fawcett
- Re: Supercompiled Perl John Porter
- Re: Supercompiled Perl Josiah Bryan
- Re: Supercompiled Perl Simon Cozens
- RE: Supercompiled Perl David M Guzak
- RE: Supercompiled Perl guinevere liberty
- Re: Supercompiled Perl Andrei P. Nemytykh
- Re: Supercompiled Perl Gidon Wise
- Re: Supercompiled Perl Helmut Enck-Radana
- RE: Supercompiled Perl Allen_Gregg
- Re: Supercompiled Perl Valentin Turchin