On 30/12/2012, at 22.19, Paul Johnson <p...@pjcj.net> wrote: > Perfect is the enemy of good, and this has dogged many similar > initiatives, but GEDCOMX seems to have swung in the opposite direction > entirely. I would be pleased to see the project make real progress but > I'm afraid that I find it unlikely.
I agree, there are many unsolved issues with GedcomX, and the specification is nowhere near mature enough for anyone to have started writing actual code -- but I figure it'll be slightly more likely to get to that point if I contribute when I can. Mikkel
