On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 10:42:25PM +0100, Mikkel Eide Eriksen wrote: > On 30/12/2012, at 22.19, Paul Johnson <p...@pjcj.net> wrote: > > Perfect is the enemy of good, and this has dogged many similar > > initiatives, but GEDCOMX seems to have swung in the opposite direction > > entirely. I would be pleased to see the project make real progress but > > I'm afraid that I find it unlikely. > > I agree, there are many unsolved issues with GedcomX, and the > specification is nowhere near mature enough for anyone to have started > writing actual code -- but I figure it'll be slightly more likely to > get to that point if I contribute when I can.
I absolutely agree, and I applaud you and everyone else who is doing so (thanks for opening the data model ticket). I hope that at some point the project will get to a point where someone can make an implementation in Perl. -- Paul Johnson - p...@pjcj.net http://www.pjcj.net