On Thu, 03 May 2001 17:20:13 EDT, Benjamin Sugars wrote: >> My best guess is that it is surely in the realm of the possible for >> Perl 5. If it doesn't break binary compatibility, maybe even 5.6.x. > >Wow, that sounds ambitious considering Jarkko wants 5.8.0 this summer. >Would not 5.8.0 obviate 5.6.x? Yes, it would. I'd be very happy to not have to maintain 5.6.x any more than necessary. Sarathy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
