On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 08:18:38PM -0400, Benjamin Sugars wrote: > On Thu, 3 May 2001, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > > The "today" implementation of Perl most definitely isn't calling > > getpwnam_r() et alia, and Dan is very aware of the fact :-) > > (reference: the Todo file) > > Errr, I see... the nefarious "Would be nice to have" section. > > I forsee Configure madness -- and worse -- down that path, but would it Please ignore the foam around my mouth. > actually help in the end? Yes, it would help -- but we have more important thread-brokenness to worry about. May I introduce you to reg*.[hc] and t/lib/thr5005.t 19..21? > Cheers, > -Ben > > -- > Benjamin Sugars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Nicholas Clark
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Nicholas Clark
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Chris Stith
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
