On Thu, 3 May 2001, Gurusamy Sarathy wrote: > I hope you're not saying designing things badly is unavoidable because > bad design already exists elsewhere in the code. :-) :-) Rather that your hands might be tied when certain things are beyond your control. Callouts to non-reentrant libraries, for instance, did not seem to be protected by your scheme. But perhaps the necessary precautions already exist in the core by virtue of 5.005 threads? > My best guess is that it is surely in the realm of the possible for > Perl 5. If it doesn't break binary compatibility, maybe even 5.6.x. Wow, that sounds ambitious considering Jarkko wants 5.8.0 this summer. Would not 5.8.0 obviate 5.6.x? Cheers, -Ben -- signer: can't create ~/.sig: Host is down
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Brian
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Jarkko Hietaniemi
