At 10:43 AM 5/4/2001 -0400, Benjamin Sugars wrote:
>On Fri, 4 May 2001, Alan Burlison wrote:
>
> > This is distinctly non-trivial.
>
>And ultimately fruitless too, I fear. Which is why the programmer will
>still need to guard entry into critical sections.
>
>The thing that I'm worried about is that with a lot of the perl runtime
>dependent on external libc's and the like, one doesn't even know where the
>critical sections are, at least not in a cross-platform sense.
Yup. Perl 5 is busted so many ways it's not even funny. The amazing thing
is how well it works anyway.
The one nice thing about this flaring up again is I'm taking notes about
the stuff we don't want to do for perl 6, and the things we're going to
want to provide for extensions so they can do stuff portably.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Chris Stith
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Jens-Uwe Mager
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Jens-Uwe Mager
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- One more time Kurt D. Starsinic
- Re: One more time Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
