On Fri, 04 May 2001 10:50:39 EDT, Dan Sugalski wrote: >At 10:43 AM 5/4/2001 -0400, Benjamin Sugars wrote: >>The thing that I'm worried about is that with a lot of the perl runtime >>dependent on external libc's and the like, one doesn't even know where the >>critical sections are, at least not in a cross-platform sense. > >Yup. Perl 5 is busted so many ways it's not even funny. I assume you're talking about USE_ITHREADS. Can you elaborate on exactly what bustage you're talking about? AFAIK, the only way the USE_ITHREADS code is currently busted is for regular expressions that modify the optree directly (which is supposed to be readonly). I don't know of any others. Note that that problem is irrelevant unless perl_clone() is used to create an interpreter. If you're running independent interpreters, USE_ITHREADS is in fact completely safe, AFAIK. Sarathy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Jens-Uwe Mager
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Jens-Uwe Mager
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- One more time Kurt D. Starsinic
- Re: One more time Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
