Hello,
Please take this thread off p5p.
A referee has spoken. Twice.
- Kurt
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 11:17:32AM +0100, Alan Burlison wrote:
> Jens-Uwe Mager wrote:
>
> > Well, no other platform I had my hands on did not allow SIGALRM to be
> > blocked using pthread_sigmask. The behaviour Solaris has in this regard
> > is rather surprising, SIGARLM is different to all the other signals.
>
> Yes, that's a bug. There has been a lot of threads work done in the last
> year, and that will be, as always 'fixed in the next release' :-)
>
> Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Jens-Uwe Mager
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Jens-Uwe Mager
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: One more time Kurt D. Starsinic
- Re: One more time Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Chris Stith
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
